The Red Pill Documentary

 
Documentary film-maker Cassie Jaye (Daddy I do and The Right To Love: An American Family) is a self-proclaimed feminist making a documentary about the Men’s Rights Movement. It interviews a number of MRAs (including former regular Feminist Critics commenter Typhonblue) and some feminists like Michael Kimmel, “Big Red,” Darrah De Jour and Katherine Spillar.

Cassie has found it harder to fund this documentary than her previous ones — something she ascribes to the subject matter — so she set up a Kickstarter project to try to fund it. When I originally contemplated making this post it looked as if the Kickstarter project wouldn’t make it. She had an “Ask me Anything” on Reddit, and based on her answers there I decided to pledge a small amount to the Kickstarter project. I then got an opportunity to ask her a couple of questions:
Continue reading →

Why Is It Harder For Men To Challenge Their Sex Role Than It Has Been For Women?

Over at FeMRADebates, betterdeadthanbeta recently asked:

[W]hy aren’t more men trying to deconstruct or flout male gender roles, like what many women are doing via feminism?

ParanoidAgnostic pointed out that men are more severely punished for stepping outside their roles than women, a sentiment I agreed with.

In my response, I noted that one reason why women and men face different levels of resistance towards challenging their respective sex roles has to do with what it means to be human (from an evolutionary standpoint) and the way we conceive of ‘normalcy’ in our modern industrial cultures:

(Keep in mind that the following is of necessity greatly oversimplified.) Humans evolved as hunter gatherers who by and large lived their lives with close emotional bonds to an extended family/tribe which they knew for their entire lives. With the advent of agriculture and, later, industrialization, this changed to people living in much more ‘atomized’ families and (especially in industrialized societies) frequent interactions with strangers. In such mass societies, it’s a requirement that you be able to establish functioning relationships with people with whom you don’t have intimate emotional ties. In short, one had to be able to place one’s ‘head’ in firm control of one’s ‘heart.’ Most of us think of this as normal but I think it is, in fact, very much against the grain of our evolved psychology and requires a complicated socialization process (which frequently doesn’t ‘take’ and results in many of the social ills we deal with, like addictions, etc.).

Head Over Heart

In traditionalist societies, the burden of this ‘head over heart’ thing fell more strongly on men, because a) they were the breadwinners and had to consistently have successful interactions with strangers in order to make a living, and b) they were far more frequently subjected to the male dominance hierarchy (from which women were and are generally exempt) where emotional vulnerability was a huge liability among strangers with whom (as often as not) you were competing (overtly or covertly) or who posed a genuine (violent) threat to your well-being.

OTOH, women who were relegated to the ‘domestic’ sphere spent vastly greater amounts of their time with others with whom they were emotionally bound (husbands, children, and parents). They were also spared the expectation of being capable of violence.
Continue reading →

A Back From The Dead Open Thread

A lot of blogs have struggled over the past couple of years. It’s a trend I noticed about four years ago, but it’s really become apparent in the blogosphere over the past two years. Even once-large-and-busy blogs like Feministing and Feministe have felt the pinch. (As has A Voice For Men too, apparently. [Trigger warning: that's a David Futrelle post.])

There are a number of reasons for this. Some are personal (like main bloggers moving on professionally), but I think there are also broader factors at play, including the dominance of social media, concerns about how much government entities are tracking anonymous or pseudonymous online discussions in light of the Snowden revelations, and the fracturing of the democratic left in light of Obama’s betrayals on civil liberties.

Anyway, things have been slack here as well, but we haven’t closed our doors yet.

Misleading UK ‘Violence Against Women’ Report Draws Official Scrutiny

[Over at Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men, Ally Fogg notes that there has been some official pushback against the misleading Crown Prosecution Services "Violence Against Women And Girls" report, with the UK Statistics Authority weighing in for the need for revisions.

In the comments, Tamen submitted some interesting additional information, which I thought merited inclusion as a post. —ballgame]

Great news again from Ally. He notes that:

The sentence “It is feasible that the proposed amendments to the report will address this issue and we look forward to seeing the republished statistical report.” is particularly telling. I think it is the Civil Service version of a very raised eyebrow.

The attitude of UKSA towards CPA also came across to me as pretty terse, even tense in that letter. And I think I know why.

I found that the issue of how male victims are treated by the CPS in their “Violence Against Women And Girls” (VAWG) report has a story that predates by about a year the letter Ally Fogg et al sent CPS. His letter wasn’t necessarily the thing that first prompted UKSA to contact CPS regarding representation of male victims in the VAWG report. But, to be clear, I do think that the publicity Ally et al got when they published the open letter forced the issue even more and was instrumental in having CPS finally complying with the agreed-upon inclusion of and contextual information about male victims.

Continue reading →

Avoiding The False Binary: Christina Hoff Sommers

UPDATED below and in the footnotes (2015/7/22).

I just stumbled on this recent Christina Hoff Sommers interview.1 In light of recent events, I thought it was a particularly interesting look at a more famous feminist who appears to have been ostracized by feminist academia for criticizing its co-option by its more extreme idealogues.
Continue reading →

  1. From April.[]

I am aware of the problems with the site and am investigating

Apologies to everyone for the inconvenience. Please bear with us.

Ally Fogg Takes CPS To Task For ‘Orwellian’ Report (NoH)

Ally Fogg has a couple of great posts up over at Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men about a recent report from the British Crown Prosecution Service about domestic abuse.

The report, entitled “Violence Against Women and Girls, crime report 2014-15” has one wee little problem, as Ally notes in this post:

One might reasonably presume from this that the report details statistics for crimes of violence committed against women and girls. … This is quite simply not true. …[O]ne has to delve deep into the raw data sections to uncover that of the victims under consideration, 70% were female, 13.4% were male and 16.6% gender unrecorded or unknown. In raw numbers, the offences described in yesterday’s report include at least 13,154 male victims, probably considerably more.

To be clear, it is not the case that many thousands of male victims of these offences have been excluded from the analysis. They have been included, but what happened to them has been categorised as crimes of violence against women and girls.

Continue reading →

Some boilerplate I’ve started to add to my comments in other places where I link here.

Some UK-based surfers visiting my website will by met by a blocking page declaring it to be a hate site. It isn’t. There’s no hate-speech there. It’s a progressive, leftwing site which is pro choice, pro gay-rights, pro trans-rights, and supportive of abuse survivors. Unfortunately it is also fiercely critical of a movement with enough institutional clout to persuade the authorities to silence its critics.

(If you can’t view any of the pages linked above, look at the URLs to get a sense of what they’re about.)

maha Plays the “He’s a Girly-Girl” Card

maha1 of the Mahablog has criticised Lindsey Graham for some stupidly bigoted thing he allegedly said.

In general, I’m in favour of people criticising the stupidly bigotted things people say. In this case, I don’t actually know whether Graham really did say the stupidly bigoted thing he’s alleged to have said, because instead of linking to said bigoted stupidity, she links to another critic, and I’m not sufficiently interested to work my way the chain of links to get to the primary source, or to look the matter up. I don’t even know who Graham is, nor do I particularly want to, unless he wins the Republican Primary, in which case let me know2. There is no shortage of people in this world saying stupidly bigoted things.

I’m rather more concerned that maha has decided to insult Graham by calling him a girl who wears crinoline. maha is a liberal. I’m also a liberal. So from one liberal to another, what’s up with the gender-shaming? Please stop; it’s embarrassing.

And if you’re going to use gender slurs, it would be much better if they are a blemish in an otherwise hilarious takedown, rather than a blemish in…, well, just a blemish.

Kudos to those in her comment thread calling this out. Hat tip to Clarissa.

  1. Attentive readers will observe my fastidiousness in following the chosen orthography including capitalisation. I’m anal like that.[]
  2. Actually don’t. If he wins it, I’ll find out anyway.[]

Saving some comments I posted on other blogs

There are many reasons why I might want to save a comment locally. Please do not assume that the blogs in question are in the habit of deleting or moderating my comments generally, or that I have any fear or expectation that they are likely to do so in this instance.

By the way, The reason I’m not doing the NoH/RP thing just now is spoon related.